绣春刀

在工地为什么现在年轻人不愿意讨好领导了？_我的网站

A |     本文来自微信公众号：造价学长，作者：造价学长，题图来自：AI生成                    近几次聚餐，发现一个有意思的现象：领导那桌还没来得及过来“打一圈”、发表令人振奋的讲话，员工桌的年轻人已经走得差不多了，留下来的，大多是年长一点的工长。    

    Illustration: Xia Qing/GT
The yen has weakened in recent days, edging closer to the psychologically important 160 level against the US dollar. The decline comes despite the widely watched move by Washington to join Tokyo in supporting the currency. Less than two weeks after the US-Japan intervention, the yen has given up roughly half of its gains, raising fresh questions over the effectiveness of coordinated efforts to stabilize the exchange rate.
Japan and the US had previously confirmed coordinated foreign exchange intervention to prop up the yen after the currency tumbled to a nearly 40-year low. At the time, some observers saw the move as potentially stabilizing the yen in the short term, although its longer-term impact remained uncertain. 
However, the subsequent market reaction suggests that even the short-term effect may have been limited. After strengthening to about 155 per dollar in the days following the intervention from above 163, the yen had slipped back above 159 by Wednesday, less than two weeks later.
Questions have emerged over whether further support for the yen may soon be needed, and whether Washington would consider stepping in again. The previous intervention was seen by some observers as a test of market confidence: the unusual coordinated move had the potential to influence market expectations and discourage bets against the yen. But if market expectations remain largely unchanged, repeated interventions could deliver diminishing returns. The US may face a difficult trade-off. Another intervention could require greater resources and come at a higher cost, while refraining from further action could raise questions over the lasting impact of the previous effort.
Market commentary has added to the uncertainty. Axios published a report headlined "Yen's weakness shows market isn't done pushing," while some reports suggested that the impact of the US-Japan intervention was beginning to fade. Such narratives could weigh on sentiment toward the yen and reinforce market expectations that the currency's weakness may persist.
Washington's involvement in supporting the yen may reflect broader economic and policy considerations. These could include avoiding a scenario in which Japan sells US Treasury holdings to support the currency, as well as concerns that a weaker yen could give Japanese exporters a greater competitive advantage. These possible considerations suggest that the intervention alone does not fully address the underlying forces behind the yen's weakness. This may help explain why the market has so far been reluctant to view the move as a turning point for the currency.
Washington's decision to join the intervention may have reflected concerns, as some observers suggest, that the yen's prolonged weakness had begun to affect US interests. If markets remain unconvinced by the US-Japan intervention, one possible outcome is that Washington could push Japan to take more costly measures to support the yen. Such a scenario could instead create some strain between Washington and Tokyo.
Beyond short-term market dynamics, the yen's weakness also reflects deeper challenges facing the Japanese economy, making a sustained reversal difficult. The currency's prolonged weakness has been influenced by the interest rate gap between Japan and the US, while also reflecting longer-term concerns over the diminishing returns of Japan's traditional growth model.
This leaves Japan facing a delicate policy balance between supporting growth and stabilizing the currency. While lower interest rates could help boost economic activity, continued weakness in the yen may strengthen calls for Japan's central bank to consider further rate increases to narrow the interest rate gap with the US.
Japan's structural challenges mean that a sustained appreciation of the yen will not be easy to achieve. The question of whether to pursue stronger measures, even at the cost of some economic growth, has become more complicated as the US takes a role in the issue. Japan may face greater pressure to support the currency, even though doing so would be difficult and could carry broader economic costs.
The author is a reporter with the Global Times. [email protected]

。                   要放在从前，年轻人多半会主动凑过去敬酒、说几句漂亮话，为自己的职业道路铺铺路。能留到最后的，往往被认为“前途光明”。                   但现在不一样了。大家好像只想安安静静吃完自己的饭，不愿在饭桌上多停留一秒。时代真的变了——年轻人，越来越不愿意讨好领导了。                   我琢磨了一下，原因大概有这几个方面：                    第一，做这件事，真的有好处吗？                    人性本质是趋利避害的。如果不能“趋利”，那至少也得“我乐意”。                   你喝了这顿酒，工作就会少一点吗？                    你喝了这顿酒，就能升职加薪吗？                    你喝了这顿酒，就能提前休假回家吗？                    都不会。                   它只会让你半夜爬起来抱着马桶吐，只会让你第二天昏昏沉沉上工地“打灰”。                   所以现在的年轻人，是真的“人间清醒”。                   第二，不做这件事，真的有坏处吗？                    有些领导管了几个人，就觉得自己能拿捏谁、能给谁穿小鞋，甚至随便开除人——这想法，未免太天真。                   这一代年轻人，不一样。

B |                    他们大多“吃过见过”，你和他爸妈比，段位可能还差一截。                   真要讨好，回家说句“爸爸妈妈我爱你们”不更香吗？                    除非你这工作牛到离开就找不到下家——那叫“有坏处”；                    除非你这工作好到外面没有匹配的岗位——那叫“有好处”。                   可如果你既给不了好处，又制造不了坏处——那人家凭什么讨好你？你算老几？                    第三，如果没有利害关系，那我喜不喜欢做这件事？                    说实话，大部分工作的待遇，既没高到让人放下身段，也不至于让人离开就活不下去。                   那为什么还是有一些管理者受人尊敬、甚至被“讨好”呢？                    因为人格魅力。                   有的领导，真心为手下兄弟着想——有肉吃肉，有汤喝汤，愿意为大家谋福利，而不是只顾自己。                   他们是“有事一起上”，而不是“有事你先上”。                   那不是上下级的控制，而是“你是我大哥，我无论如何也得给你撑场面”。                   最后我想说：                    这年头，大家出来上班都是为了赚钱养家。                   我们签合同，平等互利。我干活，你给钱，清清楚楚的事。何必非得把“讨好”这一套搬出来，把简单的事情搞复杂？                    本文来自微信公众号：造价学长，作者：造价学长。

Current article:http://7we2.yepenchunshouzuiwai.shop/news/20260826_6296.html

Published on:00:00:00